Talk:US Light Aircraft Hornet

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the US Light Aircraft Hornet article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in California may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Speculation about company edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

I've marked the passage "apparently out of business" in this artilce as speculation. As written, it is an un-verifaible assumption made without specific evidence. The company probably is out of business, but if no verifiable support for that can be provided, the speculation doesn't belong here. If the company (or its products) aren't notable enough to leave a mark after ceasing operations or production, then perhaps the subject of the article doesn't meet WP:GNG in the first place, and the article should be removed. -- Mikeblas (talk) 17:02, 28 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

We are into WP:BLUESKY here, but regardless it is now

Fixed, with precisely what we do know. - Ahunt (talk) 17:36, 28 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

I don't think there's anything WP:BLUESKY about requiring such a claim to be verifiable and so I'm glad you've decided to make an appropriate fix. Thanks! -- Mikeblas (talk) 14:43, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

There is always an editing solution that keeps everyone happy. It is just a matter of locating it. - Ahunt (talk) 14:46, 1 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic