This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Where was this ship built? What is the connection with Pennsylvania? The article does not say. --DThomsen8 (talk) 00:42, 29 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
It is in the infobox: William Cramp and Sons, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. But I do agree that the prose is lacking this crucial element. -MBK004 06:08, 29 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
The only two relations with Pennsylvania are that the ship was built there (as MBK004 pointed out) and after its second decommission in 1914 it was moored there together with all the other obsolete battleships. I will add something to the prose about it being build in Philadelphia, but to be honest I think this lies outside the Pennsylvania projects scope (especially with the separate Wikipedia:WikiProject Philadelphia).Yoenit (talk) 09:12, 29 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It's not often (indeed rarely) that the above can be said about a Wiki article, but these do apply to this one. Good job. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.61.140 (talk) 15:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
.jpg)
.svg){kind=small}