Talk:UPN

Latest comment: 16 days ago by 77.237.189.214 in topic Network ended a the young career

Stations to Not Carry UPN's Final 13 Days edit

The stations joining My Network TV will begin showing MNTV programming September 5. However, UPN doesn't shut down until September 17. How will the stations handle this? Will they carry UPN programming in a different time block, or just drop the affiliation all together? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.104.224.115 (talkcontribs)

Actually it was on September 15th, 2006, they were showing ads to the newly network MyNetworkTV. panicpack121 —Preceding comment was added at 01:19, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Title Change edit

In Chicago, UPN changed the station name several times.From UPN to Power 50 to to My 50.--Always Gotta Keep it Real, Cute 1 4 u 20:16, 31 July 2006 (UTC)Reply



Is upn on Guam?


South Park and The Simpsons edit

My UPN channel show South Park and The Simpsons every weekday. Does this only happen in Maine or something? -Let There Be Rock

In Kansas City and independent station has both Simpons and SP Tknab 02:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC)tknabReply

Not duopolies in large American cities edit

" in several large American cities, the local CBS and UPN stations are operated as "duopolies." "

Not sure what the point was, but there are no CBS duopolies in large American cities ... that would require that they be the only or the decisively dominant media outlets. All large American cities have ABC, NBC, FOX, and many cable outlets.

Actually, as defined by the FCC, a duopoly is the same entity owning two full-power stations in the same market.SWalkerTTU 03:49, 28 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Even corrected, it would not be a terribly interesting point. It's not news, it's mind-rotting prime time TV, just like all the other networks.  ;) And the owners of the station, not UPN, presumably determine what is done with local news coverage. flux.books 20:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Current Event? edit

Any objections to adding the "current event" box for the next 2 weeks w/ the closure/Smackdown on Tribune stuff going on? --David Bixenspan 23:19, 1 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

I have an idea edit

Maybe someone whos knows how to do it (I dont), should make a gallery of UPN logos.Yet-another-user 02:14, 19 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add most-watched programs of the network per season since 2001-2002? edit

I recently added a table of the most-watched programs of the network of the 2001-2002 season. I meant to include the TV seasons following 2001-2002, up until the present. However, another Wiki user had deleted it shortly thereafter. My question to anyone here is should tables of the most-watched programs per season since 2001-2002 be included? I believe that such an addition is informative and an interesting read. Let me know what you think. -- Dechnique23 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

A Clear Vandalism edit

So, I'm just going to revert the entire article, because the changes made to the article are clearly not true. Some are mixed info with The WB, and it keeps saying a "relaucnhc of UPN". So, Just letting ya'll know. Kdupuy9 04:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

This "launch returned" vandalism hasn't stopped -- I just reverted it. I think this needs to be dealt with ASAP, as this person probably won't be stopping anytime soon. --WCQuidditch 23:42, 19 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
This guy is back again, the article should be semi-protected to prevent a repeat of last time Jorobeq 00:47, 26 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
He's known as the UPN vandal, you can read about him here. Me and David Levy are the main people taking care of him. All socks should be blocked on sight. --AAA! (AAAA) 06:29, 26 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Been reverting any of his latest work. He even spammed me with his thoughts and a logo he appears to have made o_O - What a nutjob. - Boochan 10:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
I'm thinking of reporting him to WP:LTA. This has gone on long enough. And let me also say that his main activity is claiming UPN will return, claiming a Simpsons Movie soundtrack will be released, and impersonating other users, including me, David, and any of his sock puppets.--AAA! (AAAA) 10:29, 7 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
With the recent return to semi-protection, he's now reverting this talk page to the version with his comments (which were originally added under the Bart Simpson 134 and JeezyCity145 accounts, but edits by IPs and new sock Liljsakira34 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) are trying to bring them back) to get his point (that UPN should return this fall) across. Perhaps we should do something with this very talk page itself? --WCQuidditch 15:28, 11 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Shouldn't the "metallic" circle-triangle-square be here?-NickelodeonRewind1993

Typo edit

I just created an account to correct a typo, I usually do this anonymously, but this page is semi-protected, and I can't correct it.

The last subtitle within History says "Executive ,anagement", could someone correct it?

AndresX7 16:16, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Upn.gif edit

 

Image:Upn.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 11:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Paramount networklogo.jpg edit

 

Image:Paramount networklogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

JARIAN edit

User:JARIAN has been blocked and warned about their future conduct for inappropriate edits to this and similar pages. Feel free to bring any future problems with this user to my attention. Thanks, Deiz talk 00:57, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Network ended a the young career edit

Should mention the fact that this network single handedly ended the professional wrestling career of Muhammad Hassan with their self righteousness.

UPN must be held accountable for ending a 23 year old's promising career over nonsensical crap. Everyone knows pro wrestling storyline are not real so why was it such a big deal to kill the poor guys job?

This should be mentioned 2A02:6B60:31DA:0:A4FA:C0F5:79EA:B447 (talk) 20:47, 12 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Upn 77.237.189.214 (talk) 21:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply