Talk:Typhoon Neoguri (2008)/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   The writing's generally excellent. Just a couple questions, though. Unless I'm missing something, this makes no sense: After attaining tropical storm status, significant intensification was limited due to a slight increase in wind shear as well as impeded outflow.[11] The slowing of the weakening trend was temporary, and by early on April 16 the organization had rapidly improved.[12] Also, in the sentence, The ship they were on had sank, and the crew clung to debris and made makeshift rafts to survive in the waters, "...had sank..."? I don't think that's correct grammar, but I'm not positive.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Some more impact would be nice, but I know that could be hard to come by.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Excellent work! Just a couple questions, which could just be my being stupid. It passes. Cheers! Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 02:28, 12 June 2008 (UTC)