Talk:Twice Upon a Christmas

Latest comment: 11 years ago by BDD in topic Requested move

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 21:13, 12 February 2013 (UTC) (non-admin closure)Reply

Twice Upon a Christmas (film)Twice Upon a Christmas – Moved recently from the plain title to the (film) title, without discussion, to disambiguate from Mickey's Twice Upon a Christmas. There are only these two possibilities, and each has a distinct title, so the move and the creation of the dab page are unnecessary. A pointer to the Mickey Mouse video can be handled by a hatnote on this article. ShelfSkewed Talk 19:14, 5 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • Support. The parenthetical disambiguation "(film)" is not needed and is not even helpful in distinguishing it from the "Mickey's" article as that too is a film. A hatnote pointing to the other film at the top of the article is all that is needed. Rreagan007 (talk) 19:44, 5 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Support and speedy close per WP:BRD. Recent unilateral moves that are opposed should be reverted and discussed either here or at Talk:Twice Upon a Christmas (disambiguation). I might support the no-primary-topic angle if discussed, though. elvenscout742 (talk) 04:26, 6 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.