Talk:TweetDeck

Latest comment: 2 months ago by Oğuzlar in topic Move to X Pro?

Redone edit

Have redone it with some more sources. If there is other stuff wrong, please tell me before you delete it so I can try & change it! Thanks dottydotdot (talk) 10:57, 29 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Also can someone make the title have a capital D so it's TweetDeck? dottydotdot (talk) 11:17, 29 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Done Greggers (tc) 11:32, 29 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Infobox edit

I added an infobox, but they haven't provided a whole lotta informat<script type="text/javascript" src="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Omegatron/monobook.js/addlink.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script>ion, so there's a lot of <script type="text/javascript" src="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Omegatron/monobook.js/addlink.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script>unknown stuff in there. Can someone who knows about this product please go through the box and make sure its factually correct. Cheers. Greggers (tc) 11:58, 29 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

The logo is on the Tweetdeck website here: [1] but are we allowed to use it? & how do you do it? dottydotdot (talk) 15:31, 29 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ta-dah! Thanks for the link. Greggers (tc) 15:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

3rd party services edit

The article mentions 3rd party services like twitscoop, stocktwits etc. Maybe it would be useful to create the corresponding wikipedia pages ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.140.114.176 (talk) 21:09, 14 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Only if they're notable enough. Never create articles for the sake of it or because they appear somewhere else. But if the subject deserves it (ie is notable, verifiable etc) then an article will undoubtedly appear by its own accord. Greg Tyler (tc) 08:56, 15 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

iPhone OS? edit

I added that it's now on the iPhone OS, but someone please add then into the article? [2] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Undertakerhbk588 (talkcontribs) 22:34, 18 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Not working on Vista? edit

I saw this in the article, near UserVoice: "although the program itself is virtually undownloadable by Vista users." First of all UserVoice is web-based and can therefore not be downloaded, and TweetDeck works fine on Vista. I was afraid to get it out though, since this was added quite some edits ago. Thoughts? arienh4(Talk) 21:17, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Doubts arise every time a new release of Windows comes (should be Win7 now, I suppose), heck, even for Ubuntu. It's safe to ignore such "news" especially when they are short on details. bjfs discuss 12:00, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Purchase price edit

“On May 25, 2011, TweetDeck was bought by Twitter with a rumored $40 – $50 million purchase price including both cash and Twitter stock.”

What does that mean, “including both cash and Twitter stock”? --Adam Brody (talk) 18:59, 12 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Some cash, plus some shares in the company (i.e. Twitter). Sometimes companies use their shares to pay for assets they purchase. Maksym Kozub (talk) 08:54, 17 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Version number edit

What is the deal with version-numbers of the products? 1.5.3 is new? 0.38.3 is new? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.121.137.114 (talk) 12:11, 17 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

TweetDeck or Tweetdeck edit

Original name was TweetDeck, but there are times when Tweetdeck (without CAP D) is used. Someone should clarify the difference or edit out the misteak. Bellagio99 (talk) 03:19, 19 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Meaning of "deck" in name edit

Mention exactly which of Deck (disambiguation) the name comes from. I.e., deck (cards), or cockpit or observation deck... Jidanni (talk) 20:50, 11 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Move to X Pro? edit

I guess such a move would be reasonable since, it has been renamed. Oğuzlar 12:35, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply