Talk:Tushar Gandhi

Tushar Gandhi's comment on Dr Vijay Mallya

It is a shame to hear that Tushar Gandhi would like to thank Dr repeat Doctor Vijay Mallya ( ex MP ) for the favour HE has done for the country by salvaging the items auctioned yesterday belonging to Mahatma Gandhi. Please read the following activity of Vijay Mallya in his group company Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilisers Ltd. Posted by: Stephen Jose

I worked with Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilisers Ltd., for 20 continuous years since 1973. I had an excellent career and track record, with this joint sector Company, from the Greenfield stage, in their Marketing Division, and had the distinction of getting all promotions, being the first among equals during the entire service with them. I never had any blemish in the career history nor records to the contrary. I left by resigning consequent to getting a better assignment with Nagarjuna Fertilisers & Chcmicals Ltd., ( NFCL ) and left Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilisers in the year 1993. I resigned and left Mangalore Chemicals & Fertilisers ( MCFL ) in 1993, a UB Group Company by then, mainly due to two main reasons: 1. I got a better assignment with NFCL.

2. The new Managing Director consequent to take over of MCFL by the UB Group, though a good professional and Technocrat was a peculiar character, otherwise. This new MD had a tiff with my brother, in the past, in his earlier assignment as CMD of FACT, Cochin. My brother was working under him then, as Dy General Manager ( Finance ) which was one of the reasons, for my resigning at the first available opportunity. Luckily the sibling connection, was not known to my new MD during my tenure under him. 

In September, 1993 I submitted my resignation, from MCFL which was duly approved and after serving the due notice period was relieved and a send off was given to me , which function was chaired by none other than the same MD, after which the following happened: 1. I joined NFCL and worked for the next 7 years, where also I had an excellent track record. 2. Within a very short span after I left MCFL the MD mentioned in detail above came to know about my connectivity with his erstwhile Professional enemy, that is; my brother and made remarks in my file that all my dues accrued for the service of 20 years should be withheld. As correspondences and Registered letters, did not result in any solution, through the legal process, I obtained my dues like PF, Gratuity etc., while still working with NFCL. The legal process I initiated only in the year 1997 after the MD, who had allergy to me left the services of the Company, and the Group as otherwise, he would have done, what best is possible to abort a favorable decision, as he is fighting using the Corporate's money, which in other words is PUBLIC money whereas in my case it is, my own personal means! 3. The EMPLOYEES SUPERANNUATION, from MCFL I am yet to get, as the rules relating to it is another ball game, and for which my various correspondences with the subsequent Managing Directors of MCFL did not get any response till date, though I had been following it up for over a decade by now! 4. I availed VRS from the second company in the year 2000, where also there was a separate and almost identical superannuation scheme for which I was eligible to participate and drawing presently the benefits of it without any problem. 5. In my relieving order from MCFL, it is clearly mentioned, since I have resigned, before attaining the age of superannuation then, Quote: FOR THE purpose of obtaining superannuation benefit it should be treated as Premature Retirement " Unquote. 6. Unless the Trustees of the Super Annuation Fund of MCFL do not clear my request, to the Life Insurance Corporation, of India, the assuror, nothing else can be done, except again through court of law. This will take again its own sweet time and costs. My major source of retirement benefits is blocked with MCFL, where I have put in 20 solid years…of..service. Can somebody suggest: 1. How I can proceed to get my retiral benefits from MCFL as I have earned it, and it cannot be left to the whimsical behavior of people WHO have no concern for such things. This was something which I should get on my leaving the service, and which had been factored in as the cost to me and to the company while working for the Company. . 2. What is to be done as similar cases should be a plenty under Indian Corporate scenario, wherein the Trustees of the Retirement Corpus is under the Management control of the Corporate and the Insurance Corporation where the money is accrued and assured , do not have any role, till they are advised to commence releasing the Retirement benefit. Apparently the Insurance linked Insurance Plan is 100% SAFE, whereas it is not so, if the First Party, that is the Corporate - so desire! This I myself can vouch as I am drawing it from the second company where I served, my second part of my corporate life, where it was only a short span of 7 years, to draw Retirement benefits as against 20 solid years with MCFL. 3.Can the concerned Insurance Corporation, which is a 100% Government entity, be brought into the picture, as the Retirement Benefits are held with them, for the concerned Corporate entity and me the beneficiary!

read also the blog: blogblog2009.blogspotdotcom —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.68.91.136 (talk) 06:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

======================

He is said in the article to have done painting from Mithibai college. The referenced article said he dabbled in science for a year at Mithibai and did PRINTING after that, without mentioning where. Mithibai offers science, but neither printing nor painting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.70.199 (talk) 20:42, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tushar Gandhi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120418150403/http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/NewsMartImportedStories/Busy-branding-Bapu/Article1-203594.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/News-Feed/NewsMartImportedStories/Busy-branding-Bapu/Article1-203594.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:17, 31 December 2017 (UTC)