Talk:Turan/Archive 2

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Wario-Man in topic Linguistics and main article
Archive 1 Archive 2

Original Turanians were Iranian or Indo-Iranian

I think Indo-Iranian or Indo-Iranic should be placed because Central Asia was inhabited by Indo-Aryan speakers as well.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 04:19, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

This claim needs a reliable source. Current references say they are an ancient "Iranian" tribe and the article should be faithful to the sources. -- Kouhi (talk) 05:00, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

2300 date for avestan

I fail to find any referrence in the article under footnote 12 of the date 2300 BCE nor does it make any good sense at all. I doubt that Prods Skjervo would write anything like that. Perhaps there has been a misunderstanding. By 2300 BCE there can be no talk of Avestan (if this is meant), but probably also none of Turanian or whatever - the Indo-Iranians were only beginning to desintegrate into separate branches. Please, whoever wrote this, check the data. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:1028:838C:3BB2:31E9:6A5C:9C13:7F46 (talk) 21:40, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Turan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:31, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Linguistics and main article

The main article is no longer than this section. They main article should be a redirect to the section in this article.
Also the two articles do not even agree. So a redirect would avoid this problem. The sub-branches, this article lays them out horizontally, the main article vertically, so it takes more space. But they should be the same.
This article:

Max Müller (1823–1900) identified different sub-branches within the Turanian language family:

  • the Middler Altaic division branch, comprising Tungusic, Mongolic, Turkic,
  • The Northern Ural Samoyedic, Ugriche and Finnic
  • the Southern branch consisted of Dravidian languages such as Tamil, Kannada, Telugu, Malayalam, and other Dravidian languages
  • the languages of the Caucasus which Müller classified as the scattered languages of the Turanian family


Main article

Müller viewed the structure of the family as follows:[1][2]


This needs fixing. Merge. 194.207.86.26 (talk) 08:36, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

What do you mean?! Have you seen Turanian languages which includes the above info? That obsolete term has nothing to do with this article. --Wario-Man (talk) 13:45, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
  1. ^ Müller (1854), p. 220.
  2. ^ Müller (1861), pp. 397–398.