Talk:Tteokguk

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Extract new year content edit

Note: Sae Hae, the Korean New Year's celebration, should probably be segued out of this article and into a new article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Klestrob44 (talkcontribs) .

Agreed - though it should be called Korean New Year in accordance with Chinese New Year and Japanese New Year, with redirects from Saehae and Seolnal. For now I left that section in and cleaned it up a bit.
I also moved this article since it seemed pretty uncontroversial and unobstructed to try to bring it in line with the MoS. Though I'm not sure if the space belongs or not, so I left it there and in the article body while removing it from the name template (since the strictest romanizations would not have it). — AKADriver 15:34, 30 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Disagreed - It's different, sir.Jonghyun Oh (talk) 13:55, 24 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
I expanded the article with additional info and removed the seollal content as it was more about the holiday and not tteokguk. Nuyos (talk) 13:36, 14 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Tteokguk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:54, 7 May 2017 (UTC)Reply