Talk:Tropical Storm Elena (1979)
 | Tropical Storm Elena (1979) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
This is pretty good, but is there a better pic for the infobox? Juliancolton (talk) 15:20, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Given a) the time period and b) the storm's disorganization, no, I doubt there is a better pic for the Infobox. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:21, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Unfavorable anticyclonic flow aloft? edit
This was really in the annual summary for Elena? Normally, anticyclonic outflow is favorable, so Paul must mean either (a) strong mid-level ridging, which would prohibit convection of any type or (b) west to northwest shear on the northern edge of the anticyclone, which is seen in the Elena satellite image. Though it's unrelated to the article, Paul was the one who hired me into the NWS back in 1992. =) Thegreatdr (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- Checked the reference. Will change the wording to northerly shear, as mentioned in the reference. Thegreatdr (talk) 17:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
GA pass edit
I am pleased to tell you that Tropical Storm Elena (1979) can be passed in its current form as a good article under the Good article criteria. I have listed it on the Good Articles page under Natural sciences > Meteorology and atmospheric sciences > Tropical cyclones - Atlantic and updated any templates on this talk page. For the record, the following editors have been identified from the article history as contributing significantly (with five or more major edits in the last 50) to this version of the article: User:Hurricanehink.
Congratulations, and well done! EyeSereneTALK 15:27, 29 January 2008 (UTC)