Talk:Tritonia (gastropod)

Gastropods Low‑importance

	Gastropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gastropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of gastropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GastropodsWikipedia:WikiProject GastropodsTemplate:WikiProject GastropodsGastropods articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taxonomy: For all marine species, Project Gastropods uses the taxonomy in the online database WoRMS. When starting a new article, do not use sources of taxonomic information that predate the 2017 revision for all gastropod groups ("Revised Classification, Nomenclator and Typification of Gastropod and Monoplacophoran Families" by Philippe Bouchet & Jean-Pierre Rocroi, Bernhard Hausdorf, Andrzej Kaim, Yasunori Kano, Alexander Nützel, Pavel Parkhaev, Michael Schrödl and Ellen E. Strong in Malacologia, 2017, 61(1–2): 1–526.) (can be dowloaded at Researchgate.net), substituting the previous classification of 2005 Taxonomy of the Gastropoda (Bouchet & Rocroi, 2005). If you need help with any aspect of an article, please leave a note at the Project talk page.

A note edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

My question: how are we going to resolve this?

I had a quick look at WORMS (http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxlist search term tritonia) and another at sea slug forum (http://www.seaslugforum.net/species_search.cfm taxonomic search tritonia) and have come up with two differing lists of species. If B&R is the authority, who has B&R and can check against them? Otherwise my plan is to use WORMS and Sea slug forum, reference each species listed in the main list and any species which doesn't appear in either (or isn't currently referenced) can go in a 'disputed species' section in the Tritonia article. Might that be a decent plan? then at least people will know which species are solid and referenced and which need checking.

Seascapeza (talk) 06:39, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

It depends on how AR you want to be about references. Do you want to actually check the reference yourself, or will you accept the word of someone who has a record of being trustworthy to check it for you?. The species stubs for many of the listed tritonia on WP have referenced B&R. Check the page history, I think Snek01 has done most of them already. Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 12:24, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Another note edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have removed this comment from the top of the article page and placed it here. I am not sure who left the note, whether it was User:Snek01 or perhaps someone else. Invertzoo (talk) 22:03, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

"THERE ARE SOME ADDITIONAL INCORRECT Parenthesis and maybe some SYNONYMS IN THE LIST."

Add topic