Talk:Treptichnus

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2601:441:4900:A6E0:1003:D7C4:E460:35E2 in topic Affinovendia

Treptichnus pedum rather then Trichophycus pedum edit

See:

Reference to broken DOI edit

A reference was recently added to this article using the Cite DOI template. The citation bot tried to expand the citation, but could not access the specified DOI. Please check that the DOI doi:10.1130/G30829.1 has been correctly entered. If the DOI is correct, it is possible that it has not yet been entered into the CrossRef database. Please complete the reference by hand here. The script that left this message was unable to track down the user who added the citation; it may be prudent to alert them to this message. Thanks, Citation bot 2 (talk) 14:08, 14 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Treptichnus pedum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:47, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Photo: Treptichnus pedum fossil marking the Cambrian-Ediacaran GSSP edit

This photograph is not very useful to the amateur eye. Can someone edit it to add an arrow showing what we are supposed to be looking at? Or provide a "zoomed-in" image? Also, the article gives no sense of scale; how many millimeters (?) wide are these burrows? Thanks. DKEdwards (talk) 23:29, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 3 May 2021 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 07:07, 11 May 2021 (UTC)Reply


Treptichnus pedumTreptichnus – This article should be for a genus not a species. The article refers to other species and therefore it would be more appropriate as a genus level article. Discussion on the issue here Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Palaeontology#Species_articles,_again. YorkshireExpat (talk) 09:02, 3 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Affinovendia edit

Affinovendia redirects to this page but is not listed as a synonym. Please either clarify how they are related, or else turn Affinovendia back into a redlink. 2601:441:4900:A6E0:1003:D7C4:E460:35E2 (talk) 22:41, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply