Talk:Trebs and Titov oil fields

Russia: Economy / Physical geography Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the economy of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the physical geography of Russia task force.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oil in Place and reserves edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I remember that the average ratio for tonnes to barrels is 1 to 7.3. 1.1 billion barrels in place and 210.9 million tonnes reserves? 210.9 million tonnes are more than 1.1 billion barrels. I think there are 1.1 billion TONNES oil in place, which would be around 8 billion barrels of which ~1.54 billion barrels are recoverable with current technology and oil price. I think since it is a arctic field the recovery factor which would be less than 20% in my scenario would be realistic. I think 30-40% is usual at new fields with the newest technology being used.

In the German article about the basin I added some production figures (2004 - 2009) from LUKOil, they show that LUKOil had 2009 a production of almost 160 million barrels in the basin, making the above numbers more realistic, production almost doubled between 2004 and 2009 and production is still on the rise... -- Kilon22 (talk) 12:52, 15 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

There was a mistake — 1.1 billion barrels are estimated reserves not oil in place. Conversion rate 7.3 is a usual rate for the light crude, but does not applies for the oil from these Arctic fields due to different viscosity.

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Trebs and Titov oil fields. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110103181022/http://www.cisoilgas.com/news/trebs-and-titov-oil-fields/ to http://www.cisoilgas.com/news/trebs-and-titov-oil-fields/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:33, 25 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic