Talk:Trebaruna

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Fluffy bunny edit

More "fluffy bunny" neo-pagan wishful thinking and rumour presented as hard fact with no citations - c.f. Lusitanian Mythology and Runesocesius. Heavily edited. Paul S (talk) 22:05, 19 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

And now it's reverted back to fluffy bunnyness by an anonymous person 95.69.111.27, with no reason or justification given. Reversion reverted. The admins are going to be given more work, no doubt. 95.69.111.27, do you have any sources at all? Paul S (talk) 15:23, 23 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Religiões da...? edit

Sorry about Religiões da Lunfardo- that's what appeared when I viewed the reproduced A.P. article in HTML. Weird! It appears from the full article, however, that it wasn't J.L. de V. (when does he get his own page in English?) who alleged the link with Roman Victoria at all that was done by someone else who wrote Trebaruna, Deusa Lusitana, ode heroica and dedicated it to him. Can anyone find who the author of this poem was? This article also helpfully supplies a citation for the OCONVS OCONIS inscription. Paul S (talk) 17:47, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

The edit war edit

This is, as I predicted now an edit war, so I've no choice but to take it to the Powers That Be. Trebaruna, Deusa Lusitana, ode heroica is not by Sr. Dr. de Vasconcelos; this is a misattribution. Anonymous users are simply editing without making any supporting arguments - again! Paul S (talk) 18:03, 28 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Where are your supporting arguments to say such things? You even want to use a poem (ode) of JL vasconcelos as an evidence. Very funny, almost as funny as that country called Lunfarda. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.214.132.213 (talk) 23:22, 28 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Check the referenced O Archeologo Português article - it's online as a pdf. If I read correctly, the poem is not by JL de V, it's dedicated to him, as the discoverer of Trebaruna, by someone else. The library has him as the author, but that looks like a mistake. "Lunfarda" was what an html preview of the pdf gave me and I pasted it (foolishly as it turns out) without noticing. The poem is cited because it seems to have begun the idea of T. as a war goddess instead of as a guardian of the home as her name suggests (the French bit in the article) Paul S (talk) 12:24, 29 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
My bad - it does seem to be by him after all! Paul S (talk) 18:46, 29 March 2009 (UTC)]Reply

So, the sequence of events seems to be that JL de V discovers the inscription and writes a poem celebrating T. as Victoria. Later, Jubainville suggests a Celtic (or cognate with Celtic) reading of the name "Secret of the House" (secret de la maison) which contradicts the idea of a victory goddess. Neo-Pagans in Portugal seem to stick with the original idea, however... is this for another reason, apart from the ode heroica? The page is here http://biblioteca.mnarqueologia-ipmuseus.pt/oarqueologo/OAP_S1_v29_1933/OAP_S1_v29_1933_150dpi_pdf/p163-168/p163-168.pdf my Portuguese is, as you may have noticed, appallingly bad: it was the French bit I was interested in. Paul S (talk) 19:04, 29 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

'Her name could be derived from the Celtic *trebo (home) and *runa (secret, mystery)...' edit

Her name could also be interpreted as a Celtiberian reflex of Proto-Celtic *treb(o)-aru-no- ~ *treb(o)-arou-no- [house-grain-ish] '(goddess) of household corn.' This might imply a Celtiberian Ceres, perhaps an Iberian counterpart to the Gaulish Segeta 'the sown (goddess).' Geoffrey.M.Gleadall (talk) 03:48, 12 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Trebaruna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply