Talk:Treaty of Greenville (1814)

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Sbalfour in topic Entire article is irrelevant

Normal copyediting restricted edit

Because this article purports to be quoting an historical document, for almost its entirety, I have not altered text that might be considered badly punctuated or spelled. I am following the convention of letting quotes stand—errors and all. These errors are only errors by the conventions of 2012, not perhaps by the conventions of 1814. --Greenmaven (talk) 23:55, 20 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

more work needed edit

I'm not in favor of including entire treaty documents word-for-word in wikipedia articles. I think they belong in wikimedia instead. I haven't corrected the odd spellings, but added a background section. I personally think this article should be combined with that of the other Treaty of Greenville, or at least wikilinks made between the native signatories' names.Jweaver28 (talk) 21:23, 18 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Entire article is irrelevant edit

Nearly everything in this article is irrelevant. The article should be about the treaty, not the text of , signers of, or background of the treaty. The article is a shambles. Sbalfour (talk) 08:14, 5 January 2019 (UTC)Reply