Talk:Treatment of Hidradenitis suppurativa
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Diannaa in topic COPYVIO
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
COPYVIO edit
SpicyMilkBoy I removed the copyvio tag because the PMC was a CC by 4 open source article. OK to copy if attributed, which it is not ... I have to head out for a meeting, and have not checked Mayo for copyvio (MAYO is not a MEDRS-compliant source anyway, but I am out of time to address these issues). See Delusional parasitosis for a sample of how to attribute text copied from a CC by 4 open access source ... if not I can do that when I am home ... is a student going to get course credit for copying content? Do you have time to remove all Mayo non-Medrs citations and check them for copyvio ?? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- SandyGeorgia thanks for catching that the PMC paper is under a CC license, however it's not CC-BY-SA-4.0 but CC-BY-NC 4.0 (noncommercial), which can't be used on Wikipedia. I'm having trouble finding the policy page that states this but the NC and ND licenses are not compatible with Wikipedia's licensing. The rest of the article was mainly a copyvio of the Mayo and AAD pages (see here) and the lead was closely paraphrased from WebMD... I'm not sure there is much to salvage here. I have to do some stuff around the house and when I'm done I plan to work on the Chagas article some more, so I don't think I will have much time to work on this article, sorry. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 16:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- OK, reinstate copyvio if needed, I am dashing out the door ... apparently I don't know the difference between CC-BY-SA and CC-BY NC ... hope I did not goof at delusional parasitosis, @Diannaa: as I recently learned of this attribution method from her. I suggest putting a prod on this article unless Diannaa deletes it. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:27, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- I redirected it to the main article for now... since Diannaa has been pinged, maybe she can decide whether to hide the old revisions or not. Re. delusional parasitosis, unfortunately this is under an NC license as well and will have to be paraphrased. I hate copyright rules :( SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 16:33, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Finally found a page that explains noncommercial licenses. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 16:37, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Well, fiddlesticks, then I have issues at delusional parasitosis, but I am heading out for a meeting ... hopefully Diannaa will have weighed in by the time I'm home. A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:46, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- None of the sources that SpicyMilkBoy listed on his G12 nomination (here, here, here) are available under a compatible license. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 is not a compatible license. CC-BY-SA-4.0 is not a compatible license for prose, but it's okay for photos. Here is a list of compatible licenses.— Diannaa (talk) 21:12, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Well, fiddlesticks, then I have issues at delusional parasitosis, but I am heading out for a meeting ... hopefully Diannaa will have weighed in by the time I'm home. A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:46, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- OK, reinstate copyvio if needed, I am dashing out the door ... apparently I don't know the difference between CC-BY-SA and CC-BY NC ... hope I did not goof at delusional parasitosis, @Diannaa: as I recently learned of this attribution method from her. I suggest putting a prod on this article unless Diannaa deletes it. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:27, 11 March 2020 (UTC)