Talk:Trapezium Cluster

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Move article ? edit

I think that "Trapezium (astronomy)" is imprecise and slangish, whereas "Trapezium cluster" is far more descriptive. If there are no objections I tend to move the article. Opinions, please? Kosebamse 10:17, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I don't know about slangish, but I agree that Trapezium Cluster (with uppercase c) is much better name for the article.— JyriL talk 10:51, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
As there have been no objections, I have moved the article. Kosebamse 07:38, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Distance of Trapezium Cluster edit

The distance of the Trapezium Cluster in this article (1.6kly) is different from the one in the article about Orion Nebula (1,344±20 ly). Shouldn't they be roughly the same? Probably the actual distance is the one in the article on Orion Nebula, which is about the value obtained after that the article on Trapezium Cluster has been issued (arXiv:0709.0485v1 [astro-ph]), of course, if you can accept as correct the new measurement. Fabpan (talk) 21:51, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Done. OtterAM (talk) 11:47, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Trapezium Cluster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:45, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply