Talk:Transportation in Omaha

Good article review

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

If you feel this was a mistake, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you to every editor for making this article a success. —JA10 Talk • Contribs 03:46, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:369842.1020.A.jpg

Image:369842.1020.A.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:03, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Zootrainlogo.jpg

The image Image:Zootrainlogo.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --12:14, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Transportation in Omaha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927183914/http://www.omahahistory.org/Education_Timeline6.htm to http://www.omahahistory.org/Education_Timeline6.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060621130858/http://www.iup.edu/geography/Faculty/LHPDF/ResourceGuide/CH12%20Lincoln%20Highway%20in%20Nebraska.pdf to http://www.iup.edu/geography/faculty/lhpdf/resourceguide/CH12%20Lincoln%20Highway%20in%20Nebraska.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060906130700/http://www.iup.edu/geography/Faculty/LHPDF/ResourceGuide/CH12.1%20Lincoln%20Highway%20in%20Nebraska%20Resources.pdf to http://www.iup.edu/geography/faculty/lhpdf/resourceguide/CH12.1%20Lincoln%20Highway%20in%20Nebraska%20Resources.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060906130700/http://www.iup.edu/geography/Faculty/LHPDF/ResourceGuide/CH12.1%20Lincoln%20Highway%20in%20Nebraska%20Resources.pdf to http://www.iup.edu/geography/faculty/lhpdf/resourceguide/CH12.1%20Lincoln%20Highway%20in%20Nebraska%20Resources.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071024152609/http://omahacityweekly.com/article.php?id=2548 to http://omahacityweekly.com/article.php?id=2548

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:23, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

ORBT

What happened to ORBT? It was planned for 2018, but what now? 173.15.148.145 (talk) 18:06, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

Transportation in Omaha

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted buidhe 17:42, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

The article has several uncited sections, such as Trails and Highways, a lot of references are incomplete, some citations are not inline, and overall, this article seems to be a summary of sections of other articles instead of being a comprehensive overview of transportation in Omaha. There are also outdated statements like Beginning in fall 2007 there will be more than 30 traffic cameras operating on Omaha area freeways. The way the article is designed, it is hard to gauge what the current status of transportation in the city.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 12:29, 8 April 2020 (UTC).