Talk:Transport in Ashford, Kent

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Oh dear! edit

With two articles trying to do the job of one (why do we need to have this separate article? - it takes so much out of the main article which needs to be used in its text!) it is no wonder that one is out of date with the other one. There must be a decision about what goes in what otherwise there is chaos. A transport article on a town only needs the briefest of comments since it should just be about that town. Why do we have to build this one up? An article on eg Railways of Kent should do this job Peter Shearan (talk) 15:49, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Transport in Ashford, Kent. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:14, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply