Talk:Translational symmetry
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Weburbia in topic Should this be merged with Symmetry?
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
I think the current first phrase,
In geometry, a translation "slides" an objects by a vector a: Ta(p) = p + a.
is not very intelligent.— MFH:Talk 22:28, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Beast of traal 21:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Beast of traal
sup Beast of traal 21:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Beast of traal — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.246.224.31 (talk)
- If this was merged with symmetry then it would be necessary to consider merging all other specific types of symmetry too. e.g. time translation symmetry, rotational symmetry, reflection symmetry etc. I don't think it would be a good idea Weburbia (talk) 09:21, 14 June 2017 (UTC)