Talk:Traces (book)

Couldn't we reference this book using another term than "trace"! Maybe: "Trace (Novel)". I find it indeed paradoxal that a concept such as trace in being "canibalized" by the name of a novel! I have nothing against this novel, but when I thing about the term "trace", I do not associate the semantic to this Novel, and actually I do not want to. This is exectly the same when a term is "canibalized" by a Rock Band! Maybe some kind of namespace should be introduced in some way Nabeth (talk) 15:16, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

More Detailed Description

I'm not sure how one would go about sourcing this (bookstores count?), but could the description of what this novel is be expanded upon? At the moment the article is more concerned with the fact that Traces isn't part of one of Baxter's other series' than it is with what Traces is actually about. As per book itself; There are visions of histories which differ from our own, either through small changes - what if Germany had won WWI ('Mittelwelt') - or through a fundamental difference in physical laws - what if Archimedes had been right in his clockwork-like cosmological vision ('No Longer Touch the Earth'). John Bullock (talk) 10:16, 25 November 2021 (UTC)