This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Stfg, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 30 April 2012. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Needs rewriting in neutral, encyclopedic tone. --Stfg (talk) 09:45, 30 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I've attempted to the best of my ability to make the article more un-biased/comprehensible in English, (which was an unfortunate effort and a half) - but even still there are no citations, reference links or external wiki article links. I believe it may need to be inspected by an administrator. Struggling to see how it successfully made it onto Wikipedia's live space (being that I've struggled/haven't achieved this EVEN WITH my articles supposedly meeting a large percentage of the required criteria being met). Thanks.. GeorgiaKenn (talk) 10:21, 11 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
