Talk:Toxic masculinity
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Toxic masculinity article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
,_early_1900s,_Central_Africa,_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo,_Pende_people,_wood,_fiber_-_Cleveland_Museum_of_Art_-_DSC08700.JPG){kind=small}
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Toxic masculinity and femininity edit
This wiki article describes toxic masculinity, but toxic behavior is not exclusive to masculinity. There should also be an article about toxic femininity since there are enough sources available. Such as some contestants of the TV show Love Island were described as behaving with toxic femininity (Wales Online, 26 February 2023). -Artanisen (talk) 08:35, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- That article cites the deprecated WP:DAILYMAIL, listing precisely one anonymous social media user who used the phrase "toxic femininity". Hardly the kind of in-depth coverage required for an encyclopedia article. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 21:33, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- There is a section found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internalized_sexism#Toxic_femininity discussing the topic. It's a short section so it would need some elaboration to justify its own article. So be bold, gather the sources and write up a draft.--AndersThorseth (talk) 08:51, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Note edit
Can someone with permissions edit this page to include politically neutral language Editor384 (talk) 02:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 15:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 January 2024 edit
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change the point in the fourth paragraph, before the reference #5, to a comma or a semicolon if more appropriate. Marcelo373 (talk) 18:38, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
"Toxic feminism" edit
Hello, just noticed there is no article to state the Toxic Feminism, I see. § — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phuderoso (talk • contribs) 11:15, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- What the heck is that? I have never heard of it. Dimadick (talk) 23:44, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe you mean "toxic femininity"? In any case, WP:FALSEBALANCE may be a useful read. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 04:33, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Read this, both of you: https://thedailyguardian.com/what-is-toxic-feminism/
- You two are living in a rock. 69.113.233.201 (talk) 17:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not WP:RS EvergreenFir (talk) 17:35, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 14 March 2024 edit
| | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I want an image that I uploaded to Wikimedia Commons to be added to this page. Here is the image. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MasterDeanKellyToxicMasculinity.jpg This image portrays a toxic masculine man that would be a good example and provide an idea of what one would look like to the read of this article. TopDigger (talk) 15:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Not done: Photo is likely a copyright violation, and we are unlikely to use a photo of a named living person to illustrate this phenomenon. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
