Talk:Torsor (algebraic geometry)

Overly technical introduction

1. The introduction is too specialized: it assumes considerable background in algebraic geometry.
2. It is too technical for an introduction.
3. $\mathbb {G} _{m}$ appears out of nowhere.

Zaslav (talk) 21:40, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, so that intro was more of technical definition rather than an encyclopedic intro. I have added a more accessible intro, which assumes less prior exposure. -- Taku (talk) 06:57, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Low priority

Hi, can I object to the low priority? :-) In Algebraic and Arithmetic Geometry they are kind of everywhere. An isogeny is a torsor (e.g. multiplication by N on an abelian variety), etc.ArtistoY (talk) 18:37, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

You can be bold and change it based on Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/Assessment or, less boldly, bring it up at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics and see if the project agrees. Thanks and good luck. SchreiberBike | ⌨  21:18, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Got it ;-) ArtistoY (talk) 10:17, 13 March 2024 (UTC)