 | This page was proposed for deletion by Boleyn (talk · contribs) on 11 January 2014 with the comment: Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY It was contested by Atama (talk · contribs) on 2014-01-21 with the comment: The article has been expanded to include multiple references, and the proposed deletion is objected to on the talk page. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Proposed deletion of article edit
This article has been has been proposed for deletion by Boleyn (talk) because of the following concern:
- Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY
I will check references and history to establish whether there is a counter-argument and supporting references against deletion. This musician has released four albums and collaborated on at least two others. - Dann Chinn (talk) 20:23, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
I've expanded the article and added various supporting references. Most of Tony Harn's releases have been reviewed in various publications - many of these are progressive rock/jazz fanzines but his most recent releases have been covered in better-established publications: Prog magazine (carried in most British newsagents) and Jazzwise. I believe that the latter references establish notability. There are some other review references which could be added to the article, but as they relate to reviews I wrote myself (elsewhere) I have opted not to add them at present (for the sake of objectivity and allowing the article to assert itself without me getting involved in immediate self-promotion). I may, however, add those extra references at a later date.- Dann Chinn (talk) 13:38, 13 January 2014 (UTC)