Talk:Tonbridge

Latest comment: 2 months ago by 2A00:23C7:C18A:A001:9C29:417A:9A05:F109 in topic Tonbridge School


Tonbridge School edit

The article describes Tonbridge School as 'prestigious'. It is, undoubtedly, somewhat prestigious, but for local people it is the preferred option (if they can afford it) if offspring fail to gain a place in a grammar school. An interesting notion of 'prestigious'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.102.167.176 (talk) 08:32, 7 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

(reffered to as famous sounds like promotional material, non-objective 2A00:23C7:C18A:A001:9C29:417A:9A05:F109 (talk) 17:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tonbridge today edit

Balance needed!!

The two most recent contributions to this page have both been mainly ones of opinion, rather than objective facts. In the interests of both points of view, I have combined and rewritten the two contributions. My arguments for doing this are written below (note that I wrote these BEFORE rewriting the article).

While the contributor "202.161.103.6" on 20 July overstated the downsides a bit unrealistically (it isn't "full of graffiti and petty crime", certainly no more than most places - but the abundance of "cheap shops" is a fair claim), the most recent by "195.188.27.33" mentions the word "visit" several times, and lines like "a joy to visit" don't tend to appear in many encyclopedias I've read. It is pretty obvious that the latter contributor is writing as someone who has recently visited the town, rather than someone who has lived here and seen the changes of the last 10-15 years. The fact that "there is plentiful parking, all at ground level" could alternatively be read that too much land is being taken up by sprawling car parks.

I would have thought a toned down version of both contributions would be more appropriate. The downsides alluded to in the first contribution could be stated as: "There has been criticism from many local residents at the abundance of restaurants, 'cheap' shops and charity shops, and comparative lack of major high street brands. Recent moves to improve edge-of-town shopping facilities, particularly increasing the range of supermarkets, has met with stiff opposition from high street traders. The town also suffers from its proximity to large shopping centres such as Maidstone and Bluewater." Unless there are crime figures that suggest Tonbridge is far worse for petty crime than anywhere else (frankly I doubt it), I suggest this is not included at all, otherwise out of fairness it would need to be included in all similar articles.

--Halsteadk 10:58, 30 July 2005 (UTC) (Tonbridge resident)Reply


- A quick note - Highly questionable addition of Hayesbrook school to the Wikipedia - clearly by a Hayesbrook pupil or teacher.

Sports facilities edit

I believe that further entries should be made to highlight the vast array of sporting facilities in Tonbridge. Just a few clubs include: Tonbridge Angels Football Club (from junior through to the Ryman League) Tonbridge Juddians Rugby Club Angel Indoor Bowls Club Tonbridge Sailing Club Athletics facilities at Tonbridge School Tennis at the Racecourse Sportsground Swanmead Sports Ground Longmead Sports Ground including Skate Park and the many teams based at the Angel Centre.

Perhaps someone from TMBC or Tonbridge Sports Association may consider contributing. We have an Olympics to look forward to almost on our doorstep, perhaps Tonbridge may benefit from this?

Must now include a mention of the new, highly successful Tonbridge Half Marathon, first run on 25 September 2011 and will be established as an annual event — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.172.4.91 (talk) 19:48, 1 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Securitas robbery edit

Ref edit by 86.141.171.214 - Please try to keep details of this in the Securitas depot robbery article (especially specific numbers which may change frequently and would need to be updated to keep two articles in sync). Oh, and please don't remove the link! Halsteadk 12:39, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

The town name edit

The Post Office, in renaming the town as it is commonly held to have done, completed igored the fact that its pronunciation, whether spelt Ton- or Tun- still does not rhyme with gone-bridge!!! Peter Shearan 16:25, 5 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Spelling of town name in article edit

Should the spelling used be Tunbridge when referring to events before 1870, as Tonbridge did not exist then? Mjroots (talk)

Automated Peer Review edit

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
  • As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of (if such appeared in the article) using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.[?]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
    • Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, FM talk to me | show contributions ]  20:04, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply


Does anybody remember the old wallpaper shop in Tonbridge Kent during the early 1960s?

90.198.153.105 (talk) 10:32, 16 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tonbridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:24, 18 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Tonbridge/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

*  — Expand article with more information and sections eg Communications section, one or two short sentences does not make a good section

Key

  •   — Done
  •   — Not done
  •   — In progress

Last edited at 08:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 09:02, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tonbridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:06, 27 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tonbridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:41, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Lede edit

Drummondhall - re your removals from the lede. I can accept the removal of the historic spelling for the reasons you gave, but why remove the IPA pronunciation? It is there to show that "Ton" rhymes with "dun" and not "don". Mjroots (talk) 06:14, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

No reply in a week, I've restored the IPA to the lede. Mjroots (talk) 16:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Population source edit

@Cerysatpatch: you changed the population here, adding ref name of "UK Office for national statistics", but forgot to define that reference. Could you please fill in your source? Thanks. -- Fyrael (talk) 20:06, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply