Talk:Tomb of Horrors/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Drilnoth in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA. It is a nice little article. I fixed a few copy editing issues, including informal contractions like "didn't" in the prose, and some punctuation issues.

  • I do wonder what a "demi-lich" is if a lich is "an undead creature, a spellcaster".

However, this passes as a GA, without an answer to that.

Final GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): Well written   b (MoS): Follows MoS  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): Well referenced   b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable   c (OR): No OR  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): Sets the context   b (focused): Remains focused on subject  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: NPOV  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Congratulations! —Mattisse (Talk) 01:11, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Awesome, thanks! :) BOZ (talk) 01:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Re: Demi-lich, the info can be found here; since it is unreasonable to expect a reader to track that down, I added some explanation to the plot summary portion. BOZ (talk) 01:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Great, thanks! -Drilnoth (talk) 02:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)Reply