Talk:Tofu brains

Sweet Chilli Water?

Can anyone confirm whether this is true: "In Malaysia, however, the most popular kind is served in hot and sweet chilli water, with some customers preferring to buy only the chilli water as it is believed to contain medicinal properties." I'm from KL, Malaysia and have never seen or heard anyone eating Douhua with chili water. --Usws (talk) 13:30, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Untitled

I don't see why Instantnood was banned from this page when Alanmak keeps insisting on inserting redundant words. Just to be clear, I have never touched this page before. The only place I have ever seen "Cantonese Chinese" is on Wikipedia. I thought that WP wasn't supposed to reflect popular usage not tell people what to use? How is just saying "Cantonese" POV? 218.102.221.163 17:30, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Agree. It's just odd to say "Mandarin Chinese" instead of "Mandarin". It's a matter of linguistics plus common usage, after all. -- Jerry Crimson Mann 08:52, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

The information on this page is wrong,or at least is misleading .. annin dofu (or tofu or tohu) has nothing to do with tofu the soya product. annin dofu is a sweet jelly made of agar agar, almond powder and milk. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.103.133.140 (talk) 18:07, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Charles V SPOOF

Someone is propagating a joke article from Amazon. The book is real, but I doubt the reference actually says anything about "soybeans". Please check the review for the reference at: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Charles-Dynast-Defender-1500-58-History/dp/034053558X The "reviewer" states that "Charles V was very fond of soybean pudding". Also that "Charles V FOUGHT SUPERMAN". This is an obvious spoof and just because a reference is quoted doesn't make it in any way legitimate. Will someone who has access to a copy of the reference please verify whether there is or ISN'T content on soybean pudding???? Then kindly remove the item if it does not. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pmarshal (talk • contribs) 15:28, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

I have a copy of the book, and it does indeed reference soybean pudding in the book as mentioned in the article. Having researched the author, it seems that he is a teacher at Scarborough Sixth Form College, so it is highly likely that it is a former student who wrote the review. Being a teacher myself, you wouldn't believe the stuff that's posted on the internet about me. And, by the way, the book doesn't reference Superman or anything else mentioned in the review. 150.237.85.229 (talk) 17:35, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

The article here on soybeans states that soybeans were introduced to Europe in the 18th century. Given the time-frame of Charles V life, as well as the history of the contributions of the IP address of the person who added the information, I think there is justification for removal of this fact. 76.220.42.13 (talk) 04:17, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

The reference to the 18th century on the soybean article is unreferenced, in a section full of citation needed tags. I wouldn't delete the information solely based on that. 86.148.235.107 (talk) 22:51, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Since when an online review (can be done by anyone in the net, even a hoax revieer) can be treated as reference? It is completely a buls**t. Undo this at once. Gunkarta (talk) 20:39, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

The book is the reference, not the spoof review. The book is a solid source. 86.180.114.60 (talk) 16:40, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Removed as a hoax. There is no such information in that book. Any attempt to reinsert it will be treated as disruptive. --Saddhiyama (talk) 19:24, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Commons

Commons? Newone (talk) 11:05, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Douhua. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111225032325/http://www.cits.net/china-guide/china-traditions/tofu.html to http://www.cits.net/china-guide/china-traditions/tofu.html
• Added archive https://archive.is/20140806073039/http://www.yeschinatour.com/Beijing-travel/food/dou-fu-nao/ to http://www.yeschinatour.com/Beijing-travel/food/dou-fu-nao/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:51, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Spelling?

Surely it's 'doufufa' and possibly close variations. So why is the page "Douhua" and who has heard of "doufuhua', neither of which seem to have signficant hit counts across the interwebs? - Onanoff (talk) 19:08, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Nutritional and health benefit

The section makes many claims on the nutrients and the supposed health benefits of tofu pudding, yet has no sources. Unless citations can be established, the section should be either removed or shortened to those that sources can be provided for. --Big Wang (talk) 11:17, 30 June 2021 (UTC)