Talk:Tito Kayak
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tito as a leader for the Cause of Vieques? (POV) edit
AFAIK, Tito was an outspoken activist/supporter for the Cause of Vieques, but not a 'leader' of the movement in the sense of holding a notorius position in the organization. IMO, even tho he executed a famous civil disobedience act (attachment to military tank) and pledged a sign in the Statue of Liberty, he shouldn't be listed as a leader of the movement. Instead, he could be described as an 'outspoken activist'.
- Maio 15:00, 8 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Tito is not from Vieques edit
Tito Kayak was not born in Vieques. You should fix that mistake. I wil give you exact municipality in two days since today, January 29 2007. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.50.227.3 (talk) 03:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC).
As I said, Tito is not from Vieques, I found out that he is from Jayuya, Puerto Rico; and he was born on July 24, 1958. So, let`s fix that mistake.
The article leaves out the fact that Tito was in the US Coast Guard during the 80's.
Pro-Imperialist Bias in Article edit
It may be true (or not) that there is a "controversy" surrounding Tito Kayak and those who back his actions -- a "controversy" which itself would be worth looking-into as a possible U.S. imperialist PSYOPS. But besides that, this article itself has clearly been altered in a way typical of the work of busy individuals who likely support the U.S. Rightwing -- and its military -- in Puerto Rico and elsewhere. This addendum is very much not NPOV, and should be altered to only reflect that there is a "controversy" (assuming), and who is involved in it (or not). For that matter, I for one do not believe a word of this claim; nor that somehow Tito Kayak has now been magically "discredited" by it in any way.
As it stands, this addendum to the Tito Kayak article is just a low-level libel and a hatchet-job by one Rightwinger here on Wikipedia -- and absolutely does not stand as an acceptable addition to this encyclopedia entry. Someone please change it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pazouzou (talk • contribs) 21:11, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Information edited== edit
The last paragrah was edited. This is not true and is not neutral position. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amigosdelmar (talk • contribs) 21:09, 26 July 2008 (UTC)