Talk:Tiny Masters of Today
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Flashflash; in topic Critical reception
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
Am I not mistaken, isn't the info a litle out of date. I've seen Ada play bass on occasion? And Russell seems a pretty constant member? Wwwhatsup 09:10, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Critical reception edit
I'm seeing this revert war going on. You guys should talk about it here. Seems worthy of inclusion that they have had a mixed reception from rapture to total contempt. Sections should be merged and be rewritten into prose with much abridged review quotes plus refs. Wwwhatsup (talk) 06:57, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- As I'm involved, I'll talk here. I am happy for the 'Sound' bit to stay in, that should not be removed. The review section however is useless and creating a long list of reviews that are not needed by this article. This is an encyclopedia, not a music review website. --Flashflash; 14:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Fair points raised. I feel it is important to the article and will revise taking these suggestionsbigdeal666 (talk)