Talk:Three certainties/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Bencherlite^Talk 12:20, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

Reading this is bringing back painful memories of university days...

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I'm sure you're planning to write about Express trusts in English law, but at the moment it's an annoying redlink right at the start of the lead – can you link for the time being to express trust? Apart from that, and the minor tweaks I've made, I think this is ready for the badge. Bencherlite^Talk 12:37, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

   I'd be happy to have painful memories of oxbridge :P. I've got to write a few other things first, but yes, express trusts in English law is certainly a target. Still waiting on those Stack articles, btw :P. Ironholds (talk) 13:24, 14 June 2010 (UTC)