Talk:Thomas Stevenson

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was moved. Clear consensus here to revert the prior move. Aervanath (talk) 07:43, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

---

Thomas Stevenson (designer) → Thomas Stevenson — To revert recent move. Based on incoming links and page views, this Thomas Stevenson appears to be primary topic. — Station1 (talk) 07:09, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

• Support move - seems the primary usage of Thomas. And the author appears to be primary usage of Tom. Dab page sorts out the others. But if this Thomas cannot be moved back to being the primary usage, I would move to "Thomas Stevenson (engineer)". "Designer" sounds like fashion, not lighthouses! PamD (talk) 08:40, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

• Support - agree with both of PamD's comments. I feel sure that he would not have been called a designer in his lifetime.--JBellis (talk) 11:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

• Support both, revert to primary topic, and if not, the article be renamed "(engineer)". MURGH ^disc. 12:38, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

• Weak oppose. I'm doubtful that there's a primary topic, see Talk:Tom Stevenson (author)#Requested move. Probably the disambig should be at the undisambiguated name. Andrewa (talk) 22:56, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
• Support Thomas Stevenson v. Tom Stevenson is differentiation enough for us; not even his son called this subject Tom. We can consider the now-defeated member of the Pennsylvania legislature if he becomes more notable than he is. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 04:42, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Discussion

Any additional comments:

Note: You may also wish to see Talk:Tom Stevenson (author). Station1 (talk) 07:13, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Thomas Stevenson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061004113303/http://www.rse.org.uk/fellowship/fells_indexp2.pdf to http://www.rse.org.uk/fellowship/fells_indexp2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:39, 30 November 2017 (UTC)