| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | Thomas Forester was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 12, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Thomas Forester, the only American stock mutual fund manager to make a profit in 2008, had previously been one of only two mutual fund managers to make a profit in the second quarter of 2002? | |||||||||
GA Review edit
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Thomas Forester/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
- GA review (see here for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- Morningstar and portfolio link to dab pages.
- The lead is very blunt, and does not introduce the subject; instead it jumps straight to "details" and heads on the main stuff later.
- No-where in the text is there any indication of what country he comes from.
- P/E is not understandable, because the first occurrence does not have the abbreviation in brackets.
- I have not made a full review of the prose.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Not checked.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- There is only an estimate of the year of birth, no place of birth, no information about education, and hardly information about his career prior to the 2000s.
- The article is dominated by recentism.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- The article is not imaged.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- This article lacks fundamental information expected in a biography article. It is not possible to pass the article as GA without much more content. I will therefore have to fail the article. However, except for the lead, what is there is good. Keep up the good work :) Arsenikk (talk) 22:43, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
