Talk:This Sporting Life

Rugby league Mid‑importance

	This Sporting Life is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby league, which aims to improve the quality and coverage of rugby league football related articles. Join us!Rugby leagueWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby leagueTemplate:WikiProject Rugby leaguerugby league articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: British C‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal This Sporting Life is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject class rating edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 10:13, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reception edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Though on first release the film was lauded by critics, it was a commercial disaster with the home audiences and the critics...

Bit of contradiction there. And how did it get to No.52 in Top 100 UK Films? Valetude (talk) 18:09, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Just stumbled over that phrase myself. I'm going to take the liberty of trimming "and the critics." NicholasNotabene (talk) 00:19, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic