Talk:These Streets are Watching

Untitled

As reviewing admin I've removed the prod tag since it is obvious from the edits that someone wants to keep the article. It may be good to try AfD.--Wehwalt (talk) 23:58, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Reasons for nominated for deletion

I nominated this article for delition because it does not meet Wikipedia's guidelines on notability. The following things were used to justify this nomination:

• The video does not appear on any mainstream documentary or movie database, such as IMDB, or for sale at any store, such as amazon.com. I can only find it by going to YouTube or GoggleVideo. However, since anyone can post anything on these sites, inclusion on these sites don't constitute notability.
• This video has not been discussed or sourced in any major news article. The news references at the bottom of this page only mentions that the video will be shown at any a specific event. The content of the article has not part of an investigation or major news article. It has not been nominated for an award or been referred to in any general pop reference, article, or movie.
• The article has very little factual information about the video itself. It does not display what year it was made, what city it was made in, or anyone you will see in the video.
• I could not find any information about the production company, Jacobs Ladder Production either on Wikipedia or by doing a Google Search. .--DivaNtrainin (talk) 23:58, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

The nomination for deletion was removed by Snigbrook,however, there was no explaination or justification for it. Snigbrook references a previous attempt for deletion but doesn't provide any justification as to why the previous deletion nomination was removed. If anyone is aware of the discussion or rationale for keeping this wikipedia page, please provide it. Not only will this prevent other people from deleting this article, but it could help improve the quality of the article itself. If no one is able to provide a rational, the nomination for deletion will stand. .--DivaNtrainin (talk) 23:58, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Deletion was proposed in December 2008, and the template was removed by Wehwalt as mentioned above. As the proposed deletion process can only be used once on an article, the second PROD was not valid – if you think the article should be deleted you can nominate it at Articles for deletion. snigbrook (talk) 13:11, 8 August 2009 (UTC)