Heavy clipping edit

Heavy clipping and limiting. Is it appropiate to write that the mastering of this album also is a departure towards a more commercially compatible loud sound?

I agree.
and finds them moving towards a denser, heavier sound, clearly owing debt to classic rock acts such as Led Zeppelin and Black Sabbath.
This sentence is problematic. The sound of the classic Led Zeppelin and Black Sabbath albums is a lot different from what we hear on The Woods. While the former have superb mastering and clean sound with a high dynamic range, later is quite the opposite of that: clippressed, limited dynamic range and a lot of distortion because of destructive mastering.--Pettsams 14:30, 16 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

iTunes Version edit

Somebody should mention something about the iTunes version and how it has a live version of "The Fox" and a bonus track "Everybody".

<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^> edit

  • All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 19:05, 20 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:What's Mine Is Yours.ogg edit

The image Image:What's Mine Is Yours.ogg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:33, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply