Talk:The Transcendence of the Ego
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled edit
This articel uses what I believe are philosophical jargon to exlain concepts. The explaination could be made simpler, for people without prior knowledge of these terms. Terms are used that are not explained, here's an example: 'It was also Sartre's view, that differed from Husserl's, that 'intentional objects' are consciousness, and that the value of intended stuffs was in consciousness of them. 'Intentional objects' are therefore both objects of consciousness and consciousness ...'
--Uroojshaikh 10:40, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating edit
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Assessment comment edit
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:The Transcendence of the Ego/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
How can one think of one own thinking? I think it's not right, or wrongly explain. |
Last edited at 17:27, 1 May 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 08:27, 30 April 2016 (UTC)