Talk:The Teachings of Don Juan/Archive 1
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Ronenfield in topic Not quite accurate.
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Bit of a slant here
The article seems to give credence to the claim that this is an authentic work. However, the first reference provided points in the opposite direction. I think it would be closer to NPOV to at least raise the doubts that Cecil Adams does. --50.64.40.229 (talk) 19:19, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Not quite accurate.
I recall that after The Teachings of Don Juan's authenticity was challenged, Castaneda, who submitted this work as a PhD dissertation, not a master's thesis, was dismissed from the program and awarded a terminal (meaning end of the road) master's degree by UCLA. Ronenfield (talk) 13:29, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, Ronenfield. Yes, but can you recall where you read it in a reliable source, or is this mere hearsay, as in a "Lancaster found on Moon" sort of way? I am of the opinion that the books are true in a wider, metaphysical sense. MinorProphet (talk) 00:04, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Castaneda Ronenfield (talk) 14:05, 4 July 2021 (UTC)