Talk:The Swale

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kent Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

Questions edit

How wide does it get? How Narrow does it get? Is it Bridged?

see Kingsferry Bridge, at narrowest part of waterway

Etymology edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Any objections if I re-write the un-referenced Etymology section? The etymology given in Ekwall's Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Place-Names (4th ed.) and Mills, A.D.'s Dictionary of English Place-Names (2nd ed.), both published by OUP, is very different to that currently given in the article. Ekwall's version is "swirling, rushing river", and Mills' is "rushing river" - though Mills' simplified version (in a simplified book) is probably following Ekwall. Also, I would normally expect to find the etymology either in the article's introduction/lead or, more often, in a section on "History" - in this case, I would suggest removing the section "Etymology", and merging the info into the "Geography" section. For that matter, the Geography section could be re-named "History", since that is what it seems mainly to deal with - your view may differ, etc.! Cheers. Nortonius (talk) 10:00, 15 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've now done as I proposed above, in the absence of any intervening comments from other editors. Nortonius (talk) 21:28, 24 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic