 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
I believe tim magazine ranked this guy highly on something? edit
Fair use rationale for Image:The Sartorialist screenshot.jpg edit
Image:The Sartorialist screenshot.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 00:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Categorization edit
To address the reversion by Pikks... Yes, Scott Schuman is a photographer, and he has his own article where the photographer category belongs. This, however, is an article on his website. Websites are not photographers. This is a pretty simple issue. Mbinebri talk ← 17:30, 22 February 2012 (UTC)