Talk:The Razor's Edge

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 146.198.178.113 in topic Untitled

Untitled edit

I understand that Larry is based on Michael Patrick Leahy who was Somerset Maugham's friend and psychiatrist in Mayfair and then Harley Street. Leahy treated his patients by suggestion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.198.178.113 (talk) 09:36, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Whether or not Guy Hague is the real Larry in the Razor's Edge is an interesting question. Nevertheless there are other characters that could be pursued, for example the French woman painter Suzanne Rouviet from the book might well be Suzanne Valadon in real life. http://members.tripod.com/cathreese/DefiantWomen/artists/valadon.html If she and her child really did spend time with him, maybe her son knows who is the real Larry.

It has been suggested that Eliot Templeton is based on Henry Channon and that the younger American snob is based on Ashley Chanler. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.252.109.36 (talk) 22:51, 31 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

-the razors edge is also what Zen is known as

Plot edit

the plot summary is rather interesting, as I'd have given more thought to the adventures of larry, including Kosti and Suzanne. The only time the novel hints at the narrator being Mr Maugham is when he is referred to as "Mr. M," right? Anooneemiss 08:54, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

I agree that the plot section is puzzling in its selection, especially the undue weight placed on Sophie's role in the story. Also, Maugham starts the book off in the first person speaking as the author, so it is assumed throughout that the narrator is Maugham himself. But yes, he is first mentioned as Mr M, though later in the book he is called by his full last name. Anyway, the plot section would need some serious work to extract all the Sophie references and still flow well, but if anyone's up to it, the article would be better for it. — Bility (talk) 22:35, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Book cover image edit

My understanding is the general rule of thumb is to use as early a book cover as possible (preferably a 1st edition). I don't have a 1st edition, but I do have a rare 1946 edition with a cover tying in with the first film. The image currently in use is a more recent reprint (which appears to lack fair use licensing information). If no one has any objections I'm willing to replace the current image with one of the older hardcover. Thoughts? 23skidoo 07:23, 23 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sounds good. Go for it. The bellman 01:23, 25 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:RazorsEdgeNew.jpg edit

 

Image:RazorsEdgeNew.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why were these references removed? edit

by Special:Contributions/99.192.58.201

99.190.80.182 (talk) 08:42, 6 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

It's explained in the edit summaries. One is not a credible source for anything. One was being used to source a claim that it does not actually source. And one was just an external link connected to an OR claim, and not being used as a source at all. Read the edit summaries and they do explain all this. 99.192.68.204 (talk) 18:43, 6 January 2012 (UTC) (=99.192.58.201)Reply

Influences edit

The mention of the 1950s Beats is naïve. Schopenhauer, in 1819, explained the essence of Hinduism and Buddhism for the benefit of Western readers. Maugham knew Schopenhauer's philosophy and, as a result, was impressed by Hinduism and Buddhism. The Beats tried to act in accordance with Zen Buddhism but, instead, degenerated into dependence on drugs and alcohol.Lestrade (talk) 00:30, 8 October 2012 (UTC)LestradeReply

and jazz. 76.218.248.127 (talk) 17:15, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
and least we forget, during the time this book/movie takes place, there was a entire movement in the West re: strong interest in Eastern philosophy; e.g. Ouspensky, Rudhyar, Gurdjieff, Huxley, Bailey, Marc E. Jones, Jung, etc. 76.218.248.127 (talk) 17:15, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:The Razor's Edge/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I'm new to this - but I notice that this article refers to an example of "domestic violence", when a woman has her face slapped outside a cafe. The context makes it clear that the man is a pimp. It is "between two and three" in the morning. She is "young, rather shabby, but heavily painted, and looked very tired" "Presently I noticed her take something out of her bag and hand it to him. Money." Clearly the man is displeased. He slaps her. She tells those who wish to interfere that she deserves it. Maugham comments. "I always thought that to live on a woman's immoral earnings you must be a strapping flashy fellow with sex appeal ..." etc. Certainly violence to women, but not domestic violence. Perhaps the author could rejig this section?Peter Goodwin 06:42, 27 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 06:42, 27 December 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 08:21, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Ambiguous edit

Who is "he"- Maugham or Maharshi  ? "Maugham himself visited Sri Ramana Ashram, where he had a direct interaction with Ramana Maharshi in Tamil Nadu, India in 1938.[3][4] Maugham's suggestion that he "invented nothing" was a source of annoyance for Christopher Isherwood, " — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.53.191.77 (talk) 06:11, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Razor's Edge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:10, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply