Talk:The Promise (2005 film)

Missing sections of plot

I haven't seen this movie all the way through, but I’ve noticed that the person who wrote this neglected to mention the part of the battle where slaves are led down on their hands and knees to take the bulk of the opposing army's first assault. This is when it is revealed the slave Kunlun has the supernatural ability to run really fast. Later in the article, it mentions how he knows he can survive a fall that would kill a normal human. No one will know he's special if you don't add the first part. I'm not going to add the info myself; I'll leave it to people who have actually seen the movie all the way through. (Ghostexorcist 21:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC))

He also forgot to mention that a large chunk of the movie talks about how Kunlun came from a magical land and that he could run so fast he could timetravel. I think that is important. Not to mention I think the entire plot summary was copied-and-pasted from a user review on amazon.com.[1] (Ghostexorcist 16:06, 9 April 2007 (UTC))

Gross numbers

Disagreement between introduction and the section at the end ????

Fair use rationale for Image:The Promise film.jpg

Image:The Promise film.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Promise The.jpg

Image:Promise The.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:10, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

草

The Reception has nothing on how the critics or the moviegoers thought of the film, but rather talks about the environmental damage.

Would it not be better to create a new section for the environmental (complete with more details - the current state of that section is pathetic), and actually talk about critical reception in the reception section? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hackers on steroids (talk • contribs) 00:04, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Promise (2005 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060918023745/http://www.variety.com:80/ac2006_article/VR1117935170?nav=news&categoryid=1985&cs=1 to http://www.variety.com/ac2006_article/VR1117935170?nav=news&categoryid=1985&cs=1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:15, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Promise (2005 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071024020808/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2006-02/09/content_4156217.htm to http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2006-02/09/content_4156217.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:19, 19 January 2018 (UTC)