| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
Hello - I've done a lot of work on this page to raise the level up to what, I believe, you are looking for. I've added a significant amount of links that demonstrate the band's importance both historically and on the contemporary music scene. I've also also references for the publications mentioned in the text, while also adding many new publications that have cited the importance of the band. Lastly, I've made some minor changes/additions to correct some misinformation and lapses in grammatical correctness by the former person who put this page together..thank you. 19 May 2011 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bl0odool0op76 (talk • contribs) 01:13, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
This band is an influential piece of modern experimental rock and roll history and their story should not be deleted. I am working day and night to continuously update any and all relevant information. Raymond Hanstein
- Welcome to Wikipedia! :) Yes yes, every band is influential and has their own unique story to tell. Please read WP:Notability to learn what guidelines must be followed to establish notability -- simply saying so isn't enough. Regards Kittensandrainbows (talk) 02:21, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if this article fully meets the A7 criterion - their roots supposedly go back to 1968, and the page mentions them getting reviews in "The Village Voice, Trouser Press, and Op Magazine" - if these reviews could be proven, and other coverage could be located as well, this article would probably meet the criteria for inclusion. Personally, I would recommend removing the SD or userfying the article, and asking the author to locate some reliable sources. - I.M.S. (talk) 02:35, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Regretably little coverage, but here's what I've found from a quick search (more could probably be found with a little more effort). Here's an [http://www.amazon.com/1977-1981-Notekillers/dp/B000661XM2 Amazon listing]. Also, a passing mention in the book Custom Bicycles: A Passionate Pursuit By Christine Elliott: here. A piece in The Wire: [1]. - I.M.S. (talk) 02:40, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Official website, David First website, D.F. website. - I.M.S. (talk) 02:44, 15 March 2010 (UTC)