| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Myelin Project article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about The Myelin Project. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about The Myelin Project at the Reference desk. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Balance edit
The inspiration section mostly repeats the article on the film and should be reduced. More interesting would be details of the projects and treatments funded by the project. Rod57 (talk) 01:10, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
No Sources Cited edit
This article should be cleaned up. It cites no sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.107.130.68 (talk) 04:18, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Results and achievements? edit
Is any results from this project? What main problem there are now? --Nashev (talk) 22:40, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past with the comment: Although this could've simply been redirected to Augusto's and Michaela's article, there's still nothing actually convincing of any independent notability apart from any mentions as part of events thus there's nothing to keep history-wise, my own searches have found nothing better than mere mentions. At best, it can be redirected to their article after deletion especially considering the rather advertorial nature of the contents. It was contested by Kvng (talk · contribs) on 2016-07-01 with the comment: Evidence of notability: [1], [2], [3]. ~Kvng (talk) 01:54, 1 July 2016 (UTC) |
- @Kvng: Highbeam.com was shut down in 2018, so I don't know what was at those links, and the Myelin Project was folded into another organization five years ago. The article still references only the project's own self-published material (now mostly dead links). — BarrelProof (talk) 18:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Source credibility edit
I think the source links below just go to the same scam website 208.71.74.8 (talk) 18:08, 14 February 2023 (UTC)