Talk:The Music of Grand Theft Auto V
Latest comment: 10 years ago by XXSNUGGUMSXX in topic GA Review
 | The Music of Grand Theft Auto V was one of the Music good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 27, 2014. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that The Music of Grand Theft Auto V features an original score composed by a team of producers for the video game Grand Theft Auto V? | ||||||||||||
| Current status: Delisted good article | |||||||||||||
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Music of Grand Theft Auto V/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 19:18, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Prose
-
- Lead
-
- The "producers who collaborated with each-other during Grand Theft Auto V's development" bit would read better as simply "producers who collaborated with each-other during the game's development"
- The "music had been appropriated effectively for Grand Theft Auto V's gameplay" bit would ready better as something like "music had been appropriated effectively for gameplay".
- Background and recording
-
- "Early in Grand Theft Auto V's development" → "Early in the game's development"
- "'Welcome to Los Santos', Grand Theft Auto V's main theme" → "'Welcome to Los Santos', the game's main theme"
- Sourcing
-
- Background and recording
-
- In the third paragraph, ref#3 (Polygon) doesn't need to be used more than once in a row per WP:OVERCITE- it's currently being used twice in a row after ref#5 (Clash)
- More WP:OVERCITE in fourth paragraph- just use ref#5 (Clash) at the end of the paragraph
- Coverage
-
- Could you perhaps find another paragraph's worth or two of reviews from critics?
- Is any information available on commercial performance?
- Neutrality
-
- No problems here
- Stability
-
- No problems here
- GA Result
-
- If these are all addressed within the next seven days, I will pass the GAN.
I've gone through and addressed most of these problems; the two comments you made for "Coverage" will be looked into. I'm sure we can find some more information to add. -- Rhain1999 (talk to me) 22:37, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
- Sounds good, just let me know within the next day or two what you find. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 00:45, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
- @XXSNUGGUMSXX: In regards to your comments about coverage, I'm afraid the answer is no to both questions. I have tried to locate more reviews to add to the critical reception section, but all of the sites covered by WP:VG/RS and WP:ALBUM/SOURCE have already been used. In terms of commercial performance, nope, there's nothing. No chart history or sales reports. CR4ZE (t • c) 07:23, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the effort, though. Passing. XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 15:04, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
- @XXSNUGGUMSXX: In regards to your comments about coverage, I'm afraid the answer is no to both questions. I have tried to locate more reviews to add to the critical reception section, but all of the sites covered by WP:VG/RS and WP:ALBUM/SOURCE have already been used. In terms of commercial performance, nope, there's nothing. No chart history or sales reports. CR4ZE (t • c) 07:23, 15 April 2014 (UTC)