Talk:The Meatmen
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Improving this article edit
I've decided to begin the process of improving and expanding this article by removing the section on You Still Stuck, as it's one of the most blatant examples of original research I've ever seen. This may just about be acceptable in a university thesis, but: 1. I doubt The Meatmen's You Still Suck album is actually a prime example of whatever phenomenon is claimed to have existed at the time of its release. 2. This is psychology and has no place in an article on a band which is supposed to be a factual history of the band. 3. The assertions there are very tenuously related to the ban or, the album. 4. All the citations are about laugh tracks, which are completely and utterly irrelevant. It does not cite anything about the libellous allegations it makes against record companies defrauding their customers! 5. The Meatmen have always been an underground band, so the band has little "placement within the greater context of American consumerist culture". --Gpmuscillo (talk) 17:16, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
lyrical content section edit
Why is that here? It seems like a deliberate attempt to cultivate controversy where none exists. I will delete it unless reasons for keeping are given. - Metalello talk 02:43, 12 December 2013 (UTC)