Talk:The Maritime Experiential Museum

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Confusion with Chinese museum

edit

This material seems to have been confused onto the Chinese museum Maritime Silk Route Museum in Guangdong

Hence I have moved it here. Chaosdruid (talk) 00:14, 11 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Copyvios

edit

There was an amazingly large amount of detail which was a copyvio from the www.asia.si.edu site which states "All presented material is copyright © Smithsonian Institution,"

Particularly [1] and [2]

The page now needs some more info adding, which is not a WP:COPYVIO or plagiarised, as it is due to open in May

Chaosdruid (talk) 18:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Undoing of edits

edit

Hi

@ IP who last edited: I have undone your edits - Not all the edits were bad ones, but as they were done in one big edit I could not separate the good from the bad. You introduced some interesting innacuracies - the items were not recovered from the Jewel of Muscat, for example, as the Jewel never sank? SOme of the text is not really relevant to the Museum and none of them were cited with refs. I have to go out for a while but will look over and try and pick out some of the salient correct points for re-insertion in a while Chaosdruid (talk) 21:44, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Deletions notices

edit

I have reverted to a pre-copyvio version.

I did not welcome the comments on my talk page suggesting I had performed copyvios. The editor should have read this talk page and the article history and they should have reverted it themselves; instead of casting aspersions on other editors. Chaosdruid (talk) 17:57, 12 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... The editor placing the tag did not research the article history. If they had done so they would have seen that the page was entirely replaced with copyvio text today. I have reverted to the pre-copyvio version which is really what the drive-by-taggin editor should have done. --Chaosdruid (talk) 18:01, 12 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I have removed the tag, I am terribly sorry about this confusion. There were two articles with exactly the same content, just the titles spelled a little different, I confess I only looked at the history of the other. The Last Angry Man (talk) 18:07, 12 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Maritime Experiential Museum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:48, 21 November 2017 (UTC)Reply