Talk:The Loop (American TV series)

Episode guide copyright violation

I have added a copyright violation template to this page because the episode guide has been copied from this website. Jtrost (^T | C | _#) 01:50, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Please do not blank this template until this issue has been resolved. One, speedy resolution would be to delete the copyright infringed section. Jtrost (^T | C | _#) 01:32, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

This issue has now been resolved. Thankyou for your patience, Mrx9898 10:23, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Plot section.

Hey everyone, I think someone should create a section on the main article for the plot of the show (I would do it, but I don't really know what to say). Thanks Mrx9898 23:37, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Opening Theme

Shouldn't the name and artist of it be mentioned at some point? My eyes see all

Fair use rationale for Image:The Loop.PNG

Image:The Loop.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 14:39, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

"The Loop"

The usage of The Loop (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) is up for discussion, see Talk:Chicago Loop -- 70.24.249.39 03:57, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Requested move 19 September 2013

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 23:25, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

The Loop (TV series) → The Loop (U.S. TV series) – WP:NC-TV, there's multiple TV series called "The Loop", so this title "(TV series)" should redirect to the disambiguation page The Loop (disambiguation). 70.24.249.39 03:57, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

• Support. Current title is not precise enough due to the existence of The Loop (Australian TV series). Zarcadia (talk) 12:36, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
• Oppose This is the Wikipedia:PRIMARYTOPIC at the TV Series level of disambiguation.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 14:48, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

We don't have different levels of disambiguation. If an article is not WP:PRIMARYTOPIC then it can't be PT for Foo (TV series). Zarcadia (talk) 22:20, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

How is this the Primary Topic? This TV show lasted for two seasons. If it were really the primary topic, it should show some evidence of being a popular TV show, and would not have had its run cut short, in the chopped order number for second season episodes. The Australian TV show seems a hell of a lot more popular than this one, with two full seasons, and dozens more episodes. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 04:07, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

• Support - Not precise enough, regardless of significance. --George Ho (talk) 06:42, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
• Support - If an article needs a disambiguator it should be by definition unambiguous. Tassedethe (talk) 19:03, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Loop (U.S. TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070519042222/http://www.tvseriesfinale.com/2007/05/2007_cancelled_shows_fox_cancels_plenty_of_series.php to http://www.tvseriesfinale.com/2007/05/2007_cancelled_shows_fox_cancels_plenty_of_series.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:22, 20 January 2018 (UTC)