Talk:The Laird o' Cockpen
Latest comment: 3 years ago by 184.56.20.130 in topic Some time after Nairne's death in 1845
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Layout on a mobile device edit
The forced two-column layout is nearly impossible to read on a mobile device. I attempted to fix this, but my edits were reverted. please suggest a fix here. Frietjes (talk) 13:53, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- You are being, at best, disingenuous. Take a look at your "fix" again, which had the effect of constraining the table to a maximum width of 100em for all users, which looks ridiculous.
{| class="wikitable" style="font-size:90%; width:90%; max-width:100em; margin:2em auto 1em auto;"
- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric Corbett (talk • contribs) 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- Apart from the fact that I can't be arsed do you mean? Eric Corbett 21:20, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- Oh, and the max-width parameter is there for the benefit of those readers with a wide monitor. Eric Corbett 21:28, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- I've had a look at this on four different screen sizes, including mobile; it is easily read in the current two column format on all my devices. SagaciousPhil - Chat 15:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
- Sagaciousphil, this is what it looks like on my phone: File:The Laird o' Cockpen on Samsung phone.png. if the notes would automatically drop below the main text on a narrow screen, the text would much easier to read. I don't know if it can be accomplished with {{div col}} using something like User:Frietjes/LoC1 or if {{col-float}} would work. Frietjes (talk) 20:57, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Sagaciousphil, Eric Corbett, RexxS, Great Brightstar, TheDJ, and Jdlrobson: any help in making this easier to read on mobile would be appreciated. Frietjes (talk) 15:34, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for the ping, but the nature of this ‘discussion’ is so toxic that ill refrain from from participating. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 21:00, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
- I'd suggest using one column, and doing the "translations" at the bottom in a simpler style, e.g. "fashious: adj: worrying, annoying"; "yett: door". Since Carolina was a Scot, and the song is about a self-important Scots lairdie, people are not going to have any trouble working out that "fashious", "yett", etc. are Scots words, not words from some unrelated language. 184.56.20.130 (talk) 16:30, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Some time after Nairne's death in 1845 edit
s:The Book of Scottish Song/The Laird o' Cockpen, published in 1843, contains the two additional stanzas which were supposedly added some time after 1845. Beleg Tâl (talk) 15:00, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
- The two added lines completely contradict the tenor of the poem/song up to that point, and thus cannot have been written by Carolina. They were surely written by a man (there are several possible candidates) because at that time and place in history, that women could and would refuse to marry, as Mistress Jean did with her curt dismissal of the self-satisfied Cockpen's proposal/demand, was scandalous and, to men, frightening. See, e.g., Faderman, L., (1981) Surpassing the Love of Men:: Romantic Friendship and Love Between Women from the Renaissance to the Present. 184.56.20.130 (talk) 21:17, 28 February 2021 (UTC)