Talk:The Innocents (1961 film)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Paleface Jack in topic Citation, Cleanup , and Expansion

Black Sabbath edit

Does Black Sabbath drew any influences on this movie ghost-in-the-lake scene to put the lady in black on their first album artwork? Even the storm approaching coincides.

POV? edit

Blatantly biased discussion of film. ZephyrAnycon 21:34, 22 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

It appears a considerable amount of POV has been removed.K8 fan 03:45, 1 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Upgrading from Stub edit

Is this article complete enough to no longer be classified as a Stub? It appears to meet all the criteria of a Start-class article now.K8 fan 03:48, 1 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Innocentsfilmposter.jpg edit

 

Image:Innocentsfilmposter.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Citation, Cleanup , and Expansion edit

This article is incomplete and requires more attention be given to it. Some information is unsourced and either needs to be removed or given proper citations when necessary. Other pieces of information are placed in sections that don't pertain to its information. Information such as the film's release should be placed in a release section which should be created and split into sub-section detailing the film's theatrical and home media releases. The reception section appears to be disorganized and should be reorganized and rewritten whenever necessary. If there is enough information to suggest that the film had mixed to negative reception on its initial release, then the reception section should be split into sub-sections detailing its initial response and later response. This article has potential to become GA and FA status if enough attention is given to it. Hopefully someone will come along to give this article the attention it needs.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:22, 5 October 2017 (UTC)Reply